Throughout 2023, five new US state privacy laws take effect. These laws will change the privacy landscape of the US. They share many similarities—but they vary in important ways. 

Here are 2023’s new US state privacy laws, together with the date on which they take effect. 

 

This article will explore these five US state privacy laws, looking at which businesses they cover and what those businesses must do to comply. 

Application 

Each of 2023’s new state privacy laws applies differently. But they all have “extraterritorial scope”. The laws cover entities based outside of their respective states if those entities conduct business or offer goods or services to residents inside the state. 

Each law provides two or three tests to determine whether a controller (or “business” in California) falls within its scope. But the tests are slightly different in each state. 

To be covered by a state’s law, a controller must meet one or more of the three thresholds in the table below. 

NB: In Utah, Threshold 1 PLUS either Threshold 2 or 3 (or both) must be met. 

For the preceding calendar year: 

 

Here’s how the thresholds work under each state law: 

  Threshold 1: Annual Revenues  Threshold 2: Quantity of Data  Threshold 3: Data Selling 
California (CPRA)  $25 million or more  Data about 100,000 consumers or households bought, sold or shared  Component 1: Not applicable 

 

Component 2: 50% of revenues (selling or sharing) 

Virginia (VCPDA)  Not applicable  Data about 100,000 consumers controlled or processed  Component 1: 25,000 consumers 

 

Component 2: 50% of revenues 

Colorado (CPA)  Not applicable  Data about 100,000 consumers controlled or processed  Component 1: 25,000 consumers 

 

Component 2: Any amount (including discounts on goods and services) 

Connecticut (CTPA)  Not applicable  Data about 100,000 consumers controlled or processed  Component 1: 25,000 consumers or households 

 

Component 2: 25% of revenues 

Utah (UTCPA)  $25 million or more (this threshold plus at least one other must be met)  Data about 100,000 consumers controlled or processed  Component 1: 25,000 consumers or households 

 

Component 2: 50% of revenues 

 

If a business meets any one of these three thresholds in a given state, and the business serves or targets consumers in that state, the business will be covered by the law (with the exception of Utah’s law, as explained above).  

There are some exceptions, for example for businesses covered by other privacy laws such as the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) and Title V of the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act. 

Consumer Rights 

Each of these new laws includes some version of the following consumer rights: 

 

In all states, the deadline for responding to a consumer rights request is 45 days. This deadline can be extended by another 45 days if reasonably necessary.  

The specific requirements and exceptions under each consumer right vary slightly between states, particularly in respect of the “right to opt out”. 

Right to Opt Out

As mentioned, each state law provides consumers with a “right to opt out”. But the activities from which consumers can opt out vary from state to state. 

Each state also requires controllers to offer consumers an opt-out—or obtain an opt-in—before processing “sensitive data”. We’ll explore this further below. 

California is the outlier regarding the right to opt out, so let’s look at Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah first. 

 

Right to Opt Out in Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah 

In Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah, the following types of processing activity are covered by the right to opt out:  

 

These concepts all have the similar definitions across the four laws: 

Regarding the definition of a “sale”, there is one important exception (again, in Utah). 

 

 

Right to Opt Out in California 

In California, the “right to opt out” covers: 

California adopts a broad definition of “sale” that covers “monetary or other valuable consideration”. “Cross-context behavioral advertising” means “targeted advertising”. 

 

Universal Opt Out 

Three of the five states require controllers to enable consumers to opt out via a “universal opt-out mechanism” at the browser level, such as the Global Privacy Control: 

 

Sensitive Data 

Each of these five laws includes a category of “sensitive data”. 

With some small differences in wording, Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah all define “sensitive data” as information about: 

 

California’s law defines “sensitive personal information” as information about: 

 

Each law provides some rules about sensitive data: 

 

Regarding children’s data 

 

Privacy Notice 

Each of the five new state laws requires controllers to post a privacy notice (or a “privacy policy” in California’s language). 

Virginia, Colorado, Connecticut and Utah require the privacy notice to contain the following information: 

 

California is more complicated. Where relevant, all of the following information must relate to the business’s activities in the preceding 12 months: 

 

The privacy policy must be updated every 12 months. 

 

California’s law also includes other transparency obligations, including a “notice at collection” that must be presented to consumers before collecting their personal information. 

 

Data Minimisation and Purpose Limitation 

Four of the five state laws introduces some form of “data minimisation” and “purpose limitation” requirement. These requirements are similar to those found in the EU General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR). 

Under California’s law, businesses are prohibited from collecting more personal information than is “reasonably necessary and proportionate to achieve the purposes for which the personal information was collected or processed”. 

California’s law also requires that businesses don’t retain personal information for “ longer than is reasonably necessary”. 

Virginia, Colorado and Connecticut’s laws all require controllers to:  

 

Utah’s law refers once to duties of “data minimisation” and “purpose specification”, but doesn’t define, describe, or otherwise refer to these concepts. The law’s reference to these now-removed provisions is left over from an early draft. 

Data Protection Assessments  

Virginia’s and Connecticut’s laws both require controllers to undertake a “data protection assessment” before conducting certain types of processing, including:  

 

The data protection assessment involves: 

 

Controllers should retain a written record of their data protection assessments. 

Security 

All five laws include a requirement for controllers to take “reasonable” security measures to protect personal data. Security measures are always relative to the nature of the processing and the business.  

The laws themselves don’t impose any data breach notification obligations, but each state has its own data breach notification laws. 

 

We hope this guide was helpful. Thank you for reading and we wish you the best of luck with improving your company’s privacy practices! Stay tuned for more helpful articles and tips about growing your business and earning trust through data-protection compliance.

Test your company’s privacy practices, CLICK HERE to receive your instant privacy score now!